For nationwide ethnic media news, go to New America Media »

The Terrible Case of Mitrice Richardson

The 24-year-old black woman is dead, and she might have been murdered. That question — and plenty others for the L.A. Sheriff's Department and the FBI — remain outstanding.
Photos of Mitrice Richardson
Photos of Mitrice Richardson from the "Bring Mitrice Richardson Home" website.

For the past year, I have lived with the terrible case of Mitrice Richardson, whose remains were found last week in a Malibu canyon. The surface circumstances about the case are now well known.

Richardson, a 24-year-old African-American woman, with emotional challenges, was held and then released alone from the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Lost Hills/Malibu station in the early morning hours of Sept. 17, 2009.

She then disappeared. Her disappearance touched a national nerve. It ignited loud and anguished pleas from her parents, friends and thousands of concerned citizens. There were also searches of the area where sheriff's deputies last saw her and teams of volunteers, and countless reports of Richardson sightings in Los Angeles and various other cities. People magazine also had a cover photo of her.

Richardson's mother, Latice Sutton, appeared twice on my radio shows asking for the public's help in finding her daughter. But that wasn't enough.

Sutton then asked for my help in formally appealing to Attorney General Eric Holder to direct the FBI to enter the investigation. This was a more than reasonable request since Richardson's disappearance had by then generated national publicity and outrage.

There was great concern that she may have been the victim of foul play that may have involved the crossing of state lines. This made her disappearance and possible death a federal matter.

We knew that Richardson was by no means an aberration. More than 800,000 missing persons cases are on file with the FBI. Most of those are children. However, nearly 29,000 of them are adults and juveniles who are "missing under circumstances indicating that the disappearance was not voluntary — i.e., abduction or kidnapping."

This made the case even more compelling. Sutton and I jointly made the request in November 2009 for Justice Department involvement.

The response was the typical bureaucrat's duck-and-dodge. The FBI said it was sympathetic to the plight of Richardson and her family, and would keep a close watch on developments. There was no commitment to investigate, and no promise of a follow up.

This was a double blow. The L.A. County Sheriff's Department had vehemently disclaimed any responsibility for Richardson's disappearance. The sheriff's department exonerated itself in a lengthy report, which insisted that officers followed proper rules and procedures. This Pontius Pilate hand-wash came on the heels of the Justice Department's refusal to take action.

But now with Richardson's death, the questions are even more troubling.

Why was she released alone?

When and how did she die?

Were others involved in her disappearance and death?

How did the sheriff's department, with the renewed call for

the FBI to get involved in the case, handle the investigation into her disappearance and death?

The FBI and sheriff's department's response to the Richardson case again raised ugly questions regarding how diligently officials investigate the deaths or disappearance of African Americans, and whether the press reports their murders or disappearances with the same intensity as white victims, especially when the victims are young black females.

The charge by Richardson's family and local civil rights leaders that the police are insensitive to the disappearance and possible murder of African Americans such as Richardson is not new.

Countless groups have marched, picketed and screamed loudly that law enforcement and judges impose a hard racial double standard when the victim is a young African American, whether a missing person such as Richardson, or a murder victim, as Richardson may well turn out to be.

Whatever the case, the implicit message is that black lives are expendable.

Police officials and judges vehemently deny that they are any less diligent in prosecuting the kidnapping or murder of blacks, or that they expend less time tracking down leads and mounting a full-court investigation in the case of a missing person who is African American.

The tipping point is the willingness of the victim's family and friends to go public and keep pressure on authorities to take the murder or disappearance seriously.

Richardson's family put constant public pressure on the sheriff's department to pursue every lead and possibility in trying to find Richardson. This made the media take note, especially mindful of the popularly dubbed "missing-white-woman syndrome." The term refers to oft-seen efforts to deluge the public with story after story on missing white women such as Jennifer Wilbanks, Chelsea King, Susan Powell, and Natalee Holloway. Richardson's family demanded the same headline treatment news for Mitrice.

But what if the Richardson family and friends hadn't turned Mitrice into a cause célèbre in the media and law enforcement?

We'll never know whether she would have been less than a bare footnote in the news without those efforts. Fortunately, this was not the not the case.

Richardson's death now marks another chapter in the terrible saga of her disappearance. The questions about her death are just as endless as those of her disappearance. Richardson's family now more than ever needs those questions answered.

Earl Ofari Hutchinson
Earl Ofari Hutchinson is a political analyst and author of "How Obama Governed," among other works. His nationally heard talk show is on KTYM-AM 1460 AM Los Angeles, Fridays, 9:30 a.m., and KPFK Pacifica Radio 90.7 Los Angeles, Saturdays, noon, Pacific Standard Time.

Read more stories from the L.A. Watts Times »

Leave a comment

Stay Connected

Twitter Facebook Flickr RSS Feed

Search

Archives »

 

Advertisement

LA Beez Ethnic News Partners

Valid XHTML 1.0 Valid CSS